Integrated Global Services, Inc. v. Mayo

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM OPINION (please see Memorandum Opinion for additional information.) For the foregoing reasons, the Court granted IGS's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. An appropriate order has issued. (See ECF No. 19 .) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/13/2017. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division INTEGRATED GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff, V. Civil Action No. 3:17cv563 MICHAEL MAYO, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Integrated Global Services, Inc.'s ("IGS") Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 4.) On August 22, 2017, Mayo filed a "Brief in Support for Expedited Hearings" with nine exhibits. (ECF No. 22.) On August 25,2017, the Court held a hearing at which it took evidence and heard oral argument, and the matter is ripe for disposition. The Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.' Mayo appeared pro se? The day ofthe hearing, the Court entered anOrder granting the Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 19.) This Memorandum Opinion sets forth the reasoning for the Court's ruling. I. Factual and Procedural Background A. Procedural Historv On August 10, 2017, IGS filed its Verified Complaint against Defendant Michael Mayo, (ECF No. 1), the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, (ECF No. 4), and a Motion to Expedite ' "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Verified Complaint alleges violations of, inter alia, the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831, er seq., and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030, et seq. ^On September 1,2017, attorney Zev Hillel Antell appeared onMayo's behalf inthis proceeding. Thus, while Mayo appeared pro se at the Preliminary Injunction Hearing, it appears that he now has counsel.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?