Green v. Doss

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 02/28/2019. Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ANTHONY M. GREEN,SR., ' ^ ^mhl^MOND^ Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:17CV574-HEH V. TIMOTHY DOSS,etal.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss) Anthony M. Green, Sr., a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The action proceeds on Green's Particularized Complaint("Complaint," ECF No. 18). Green claims that his constitutional rights were violated because he was not permitted to marry during his incarceration at the Middle Peninsula Regional Security Center("MPRSC"). (See id at 1-2.) Green names Superintendent Timothy Doss ("Superintendent Doss") and Major T. A. Proctor("Major Proctor") as Defendants (collectively "Defendants"). (Id. at 1.) Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No.27.) Green filed a Response. (ECF No. 29.) For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss(ECF No. 27) will be granted in part and denied in part. I. PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND STANDARD FOR MOTION TO DISMISS Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act("PLRA")this Court must dismiss any action filed by a prisoner ifthe Court determines the action(1)"is frivolous" or (2)"fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?