Lerma v. Wilson

Filing 18

ORDER that 16 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 7 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as MOOT; Lerma's 1 § 2241 Petition is DENIED; and, Lerma's claims and the action are DISMISSED. Should Lerma desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within 60 days of the date of entry hereof. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 6/26/2018. Copy to Pro Se Petitioner. (jsmi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
JOSE LERMA,

v.

Petitioner,

Civil Action No. 3:17CV588

ERIC WILSON,
Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
1.
2.
3.
4.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;
The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED, and the Motion
to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED as MOOT;
Lerma's § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and,
Lerma's claims and the action are DISMISSED.

Should Lerma desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of
the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal
within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Lerma and
counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.

Date: (o J 2.(o / I 8
Richmond, Virginia

M. Hannah
United State