Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/05/2017. Copy mailed to Plaintiff.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
DEC - 5 20!7
GREGORY RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
CLERK. U.S. Di') 11l1CT COURT
mc1 !i:10ND. VA
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17CV607
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gregory Richardson, a Virginia detaineer proceeding pro se,
submitted this action under 28 U.S.C.
amassed
extensive
an
See
litigation.
No. 3:07CV514,
Thus,
ECF
No.
47,
Richardson has
of
at
frivolous
v.
Richardson
Va.
1-7
(E.D.
and
Dep't
Va.
Dec.
abusive
of
Corr.,
9,
2008).
Richardson's litigation in this district is subject to a
pre-filing injunction.
on
history
2254.
ยง
October
16,
2017,
By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered
the
court
dismissed
the
present
action
without prejudice because Richardson failed to comply with the
terms of the pre-filing injunction.
On November 8,
2017,
the Court received from Richardson a
motion wherein he asks the Court to reconsider the dismissal of
the action and seeks the recusal of the undersigned.
harbors
no
bias
demonstrate
any
undersigned
might
United
States,
against
Richardson
circumstances
be
510
where
reasonably
U.S.
540,
the
nor
Richardson
impartiality
questioned.
555
does
The Court
(1994)
See
of
Liteky
(holding
the
v.
that
unfavorable
judicial
rulings
alone
do
not
constitute
bias) .
Accordingly, Richardson's Motion for Recusal (ECF No. 5) will be
denied.
Furthermore,
Richardson fails
to demonstrate
how the
Court erred in dismissing the action for failing to comply with
the pre-filing injunction.
Accordingly,
the Motion to Vacate
(ECF No. 5) will be denied
The Clerk is
directed to
send a
copy of
this
Memorandum
Opinion to Richardson.
It is so ORDERED.
Date:
,,{P~S;U:>t7
Richmond, Virginia
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?