Carter, Jr. v. Ray et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for completed details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 01/23/2018. Copy of Opinion mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division L JAN 2M 2018 LEONARD CARTER, JR., CLERK, U.S. Di3TniC I COURT RICHMOND VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:17CV608-HEH V. TRACY S. RAY, el ai. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Dismissing Civil Rights Action Without Prejudice) By Memorandum Order entered on October 17, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs action. On December 11, 2017, the Court sent a third copy of the consent to collection of fees form and informa pauperis affidavit to Plaintiff. The Court directed Plaintiff to return his informa pauperis affidavit and affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning the consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with either of the above directives within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action. Plaintiff has not complied with the order of this Court. Plaintiff failed to return the informa pauperis affidavit and the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for informa pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 1914(a). Such conduct demonstrates a I willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. An appropriate Order shall issue. /s/ HENRY E. HUDSON Date: Jkn. 313 aalg- Richmond, Virginia UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?