Schuett v. Wilson et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 11/26/2017. Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 11/28/2017) (ccol, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
CLIFFORD J. SCHUETT,
CLERK. U.S. DiST M1CT COUR1
RlCHMOrm. VA
.
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:17CV700
ERIC WILSON, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Clifford J. Schuett, a federal inmate, submitted this civil
action and applied to proceed in forma pauperis.
The pertinent
statute provides:
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action
[in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more
prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any
facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of
the United States that was dismissed on the grounds
that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the
prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical
injury.
28
U.S.C.
§
191S(g).
Schuett has at
least
three actions
or
appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to
state a
claim.
No. 14-00374,
See Schuett v.
2014 WL 5781409,
Governor,
at *1-2
(D.
State of Haw.,
Haw.
Nov.
6,
Civ.
2014)
(denying in forma pauperis status and listing five cases that
are strikes under§ 1915(g)) ; 1 see also Schuett v. Unknown Party,
1
Hawaii
The United States District Court for the District of
cited the following five cases that count as strikes:
No. CV-14-01663-JJT (JZB)
(D. Ariz. Oct. 22, 2014) . 2
Schuett's
current complaint does not demonstrate that he is in imminent
danger of serious physical harm.
Accordingly,
2017,
the
Court
by
Memorandum
denied Schuett' s
Order
entered
request
on
October
3 O,
to proceed in forma
pauperis is denied and directed him to submit the full $400. 00
filing fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry hereof.
More
failed
than eleven
to pay the
full
(11)
days
$400.
have
elapsed and Schuett has
oo filing fee.
Accordingly,
the
action will be dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to send a
copy of
this Memorandum
Opinion to Schuett.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
fit. f
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Date: W~ ~'-1vt7t7
Richmond, Virginia
Schuett v. Attorney Gen. of Cal., No. 14-6794 (C.D. Cal. Sept.
16, 2014); Schuett v. United States Marshal Serv., No. 2:13-cv010163 JCM {D. Nev. July 29, 2013); Schuett v. Sheriff, Cnty.
Jail of Rochester, New York, Civ. No. 6:95-cv-6216 (W.D.N.Y. May
30, 1995); Schuett v. Sheriff, Cnty. Jail of Rochester, New
York, Civ. No. 6:95-cv-6157 {W.D.N.Y. May 30, 1995}; Schuett v.
BM Fauber, Civ. No. 88-73527 HWG (E.D. Mich. Sept. 13, 1988).
2
The United States District Court for the District of
Arizona cited four of the above-listed cases and one additional
case:
Schuett v.
CEO-CCA-Correctional Corp.
of America,
No. 2:14-cv-1431-JAD-PAL (D. Nev. Oct. 3, 2014).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?