Owens v. United States et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 03/27/2018. Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Petitioner as directed.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PHILLIP A. OWENS, _J p MAR 2 720ia J CLERK, U.S. DlSTfliCT COURT RICHMOND, VA Petitioner, V. Civil Action No. 3:17CV706 UNITED STATES, e/fl/., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a federal inmate proceedingse, submitted a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition and sought leave to proceed without payment of the statutory filing fee. i'ee 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (requiring five dollar ($5.00) filing fee for all habeas petitions); 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (permitting a court to approve informa pauperis status for litigant). By Memorandum Order entered on November 17, 2017, the Court directed Petitioner, within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof, to complete and return theappropriate informa pauperis affidavit or pay the $5.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 2, at 1.) The Court also advised Petitioner that he may request anextension of time to pay the filing fee or explain any special circumstances that would justify excusing all or any part of the fee. {Id. at 2.) On December 11,2017, the Court received from Petitioner a Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to the Filing Fee Due to Indigent Status. (ECF No. 4.) In his Motion, Petitioner requested that the Court grant him an additional thirty (30) days to pay the filing fee becausehe would be in transit. {Id. at 1.) By Memorandum Order entered on January 11, 2018, the Court granted Petitioneran additional thirty (30) days to complete and return the informa pauperis affidavit or pay the $5.00 filing fee. The Coiut warned Petitionerthat if he failed to comply with the above directives, the action would be dismissed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?