Tippens, Jr. v. Clarke
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 04/12/2018. Copy of Memorandum Opinion mailed to Petitioner as directed.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ROBERT E. TIPPENS, JR.,
Civil Action No. 3:17CV784-HEH
HAROLD W. CLARKE,
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)
Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a Petition for a Writ of
Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1), a Motion for Leave to File a
Motion for Injunctive Relief, a Motion for Three Judges, a Petition for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and a Complaint (ECF No. 2), and a Motion
for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 3.) In these submissions, it appeared that
Petitioner complained about his conditions of confinement, not the fact or duration of his
confinement. ByMemorandum Order entered on December 5, 2017, the Court informed
Petitioner that it would take no action on his current submissions, and denied his motions
without prejudice. The Court also directed Petitioner to complete the form for a 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action and retum the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date
of entry thereof. The Court warned Petitioner that a failure to complete the form and
retum the same to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of entry thereof would
result in the dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?