Lugo v. Wilson

Filing 13

FINAL ORDER that is in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, that 1. The Report and Recommendation 11 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment 5 is GRANTED. 3. Lugo's § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 1) is DE NIED. 4. Lugo's claims and the action are DISMISSED. Should Lugo desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/19/2018. Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Final Order mailed to Petitioner. (ccol, )

Download PDF
c-e I c IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ANDRES LUGO, V. Petitioner, , I· � ;- I. 1 � L U EC �� 20;:7� . CLE:RK� iJ.S.'L.liSTt, 1 CT COURT RICHMOND, VA Civil Action No. 3:17CV801 ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent. FINAL ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. 4. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; The Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. Lugo's § 2241 Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. Lugo's claims and the action are DISMISSED. Should Lugo desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within sixty (60) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Lugo and counsel of record. It is so ORDERED. 9 20 1 8 Date:0£C 1 Richmond, Virginia iY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?