Proffitt v. Rose
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 2/14/2018. Copy to Pro Se Plaintiff. (jsmi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
WILBERT EUGENE PROFFITT,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3:17CV848—HEH
V.
LA ROSE,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)
By Memorandum Order entered on January 12,2018, the Court conditionally
docketed Plaintiffs action. On January 29, 2018, United States Postal Service returned
the January 12, 2018 Memorandum Order to the Court marked with what appears toread,
"INMATE PAROLED/OR RELEASED." Since that date. Plaintiff has not contacted the
Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a
current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/
HENRY E. HUDSON
Date:^e.\^
Richmond, Virginia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?