Harrison v. Baker

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 01/31/2019. Copy sent to Petitioner.(ccol, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA p Richmond Division II L b JAN 3 12019 EARLANDO MARIO HARRISON, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND. VA Petitioner, Civil Action No. 3:18CV85-HEH V. B. BAKER, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Granting Motion to Dismiss) Earlando Mario Harrison, a Virginia state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254("§ 2254 Petition," EOF No. 1) challenging his convictions in the Circuit Court for the City ofHampton, Virginia ("Circuit Court"). Harrison argues that he is entitled to relief on the following grounds:' Claim One; "Newly discovered evidence (notarized affidavit)," in which "[t]he alleged victim of the offenses that [Harrison has] been wrongfully convicted of, Jeremy Shelton, voluntarily recanted his accusations of[Harrison] being the person that assaulted him." (§ 2254 Pet. 5.) Claim Two: u "Ineffective assistance of counsel" because "[a]fter being made aware of the after-acquired newly discovered evidence and supplied with a copy of it (notarized affidavit),[Harrison's] trial counsel failed to conduct an appropriate investigation or at the least, inform the proper authority of the evidence that cast doubt upon the correctness of the conviction." {Id at 7.) 'The Court employs the pagination assigned by the CM/ECF docketing system for citations to Harrison's submissions. The Court corrects the spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and spacing in the quotations from Harrison's submissions.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?