Newkirk v. Clarke et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION. SEE OPINION for complete details. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 04/12/2018. Copy mailed to Plaintiff as directed.(ccol, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HAROLD CLARKE, et al.,
Civil Action No. 3:18CV205-HEH
(Dismissing Without Prejudice 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Action)
Kenneth Newkirk, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, submitted this action and
requested leave to proceed informa pauperis. The pertinent statute provides:
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma
pauperis]... if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while
incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a
court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is
frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Newkirk has at least three prior actions or appeals that have been dismissed as
frivolous or for failure to state a claim. See, e.g., Newkirk v. Shaw, No. 3:14CV426-
HEH, 2014 WL 4161991, at *3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2014); Newkirk v. Circuit Court,
No. 3:14CV372-HEH, 2014 WL 4072212, at *3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2014); Newkirk v.
Lerner, No. 3:13CV364-HEH, 2014 WL 587174, at *2-5 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2014);
Newkirk V. Chapped, No. 3:13CV73-HEH, 2013 WL 5467232, at *3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?