Carter v. Stith et al

Filing 140

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 12/7/2023. (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (smej, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division BENJAMIN F. CARTER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:22cv775 V. MIRANDA STITH, el al.. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Benjamin F. Carter, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se filed this civil lights action. The matter is before the Court on Carter’s failure to serve the five John Doe Defendants within the time required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), Carter had ninety (90) days from the filing of the complaint to serve the defendants. Here, that period commenced on October 6, 2021. By Memorandum Order entered on November 1, 2023, the Court directed Carter, within twenty (20) days of the date of entry thereof, to show good cause for his failure to serve the five John Doe Defendants within the time required by Rule 4(m). (ECF No. 135.) Carter has not responded. Accordingly, all claims against the five John Doc Defendants will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall issue. Date: \3\l ISOot^ Richmond. Virginia M. HanfM iMck United StaleJ District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?