Richardson v. William Sneider and Associates, LLC et al
Filing
19
FINAL ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 4 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 15 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 18 Report and Recommendations; the plaintiff's Motion for Default J udgment against William Sneider and Associates, LLC is GRANTED for Counts I through VI; the plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Count VII is GRANTED; judgment is ENTERED in favor of Victoria Richardson, the plaintiff, and against William S neider and Associates, LLC, in the amount of $9,387.50, plus interest at the rate of judgment from the date of the final judgment until entry of judgment. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the plaintiff to this effect. Plaintiff seeks taxable costs of $380.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920 and 1924 and Local Civil Rule 54(D). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to serve William Sneider said bill of costs within eleven (11) days from the entry of judgment, so that defendant may have an opportunity to object. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 8/14/12. (jcow, )
UNITED
FILED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Newport News Division
AUG 1 4 2012
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
NORFOLK. VA
VICTORIA RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff,
ACTION NO.
v.
4:12cv25
WILLIAM SNEIDER AND
ASSOCIATES,
LLC,
Defendant.
FINAL
ORDER
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff's Motion for
Default Judgment (ECF No. 4), filed on April 5, 2012.
was
referred
April
§
18,
to
a
2012,
636(b)(1)(B)
United
States
pursuant
to
and
Federal
Magistrate
the
Rule
of
Judge
provisions
Civil
The matter
by
of
Procedure
Order
28
of
U.S.C.
72(b),
to
conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, if necessary, and
to
submit
to
the
undersigned
proposed
findings
of
fact,
if
applicable, and recommendations for the disposition of the motion.
The plaintiff filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Count Seven
(ECF No. 15), on July 6, 2012, which is also now ripe for decision.
The United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation
was filed on July 24,
2012.
(ECF No.
18.)
The magistrate judge
recommended granting plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment for
Counts I through VI,
granting plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily
Dismiss Count VII, and that default judgment be entered against the
defendant, William Sneider and Associates, LLC ("William Sneider").
By copy of the report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge,
the parties were advised of their right to file written
objections thereto.
magistrate
The court has received no objections to the
judge's
report
filing same has expired.
and
recommendation,
and
the
time
for
The court does hereby adopt and approve
in full the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report
and
Recommendation
of
the
United States
Magistrate
Judge
filed
July 24, 2012.
Accordingly,
the
plaintiff's
Motion
for
Default
Judgment
against William Sneider and Associates, LLC is GRANTED for Counts
I through VI; the plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Count
VII
is
GRANTED;
Richardson,
the
judgment
is
plaintiff,
ENTERED
and
in
against
favor
William
of
Victoria
Sneider
and
Associates, LLC, in the amount of $9,387.50, plus interest at the
rate of judgment from the date of the final judgment until entry of
judgment.
The Clerk shall enter judgment for the plaintiff to this
effect.
Plaintiff seeks taxable costs of $380.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§
1920
and
1924
Recommendation 32.
said
bill
of
costs
and
Local
Civil
Rule
54(D).
See
Report
&
Plaintiff is DIRECTED to serve William Sneider
within
eleven
(11)
days
from
the
entry
judgment, so that defendant may have an opportunity to object.
of
The Clerk shall forward a copy of this
Final Order to the
parties.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Rebecca Beach Smith
United States District Judge -£j©rREBECCA BEACH
SMITH
CHIEF UNITED STATES
Newport News, Virginia
August \U , 2012
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?