Stevens v. Astrue
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendations, granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J Astrue, denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Brian Stevens. Signed by Judge Glen M. Williams on 11/25/09. (eps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION GREGORY BRIAN STEVENS, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:09cv00029 FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT BY: GLEN M. WILLIAMS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This case is currently before the court on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment. (Docket Item Nos. 13 and 17.) The case was referred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), to the Honorable Pamela Meade Sargent, United States Magistrate Judge. On November 4, 2009, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation, (Docket Item No. 19), ("the Report"), recommending that the court deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, grant the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and affirm the final decision of the Commissioner denying benefits. Objections to the Report were due by November 24, 2009; however, no objections were filed. As such, the Magistrate Judge's Report shall be ACCEPTED. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is hereby DENIED, the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED and the final decision of the Commissioner denying benefits is hereby AFFIRMED.
-1-
The Clerk is directed to enter this Order and send copies of this Order to all counsel of record. The Clerk is further directed that this case is to be stricken from the docket. ENTER: This 25th day of November 2009. /s/ Glen M. Williams SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?