Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC v. International Union, United Mine Workers of America et al

Filing 34

JUDGMENT in favor of International Union, United Mine Workers of America, Local Union 7170, District 17, United Mine Workers of America against Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC; Judgment entered denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; all other directives are noted in this order. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 1/3/2012. (flc)

Download PDF
  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA BIG STONE GAP DIVISION   DICKENSON-RUSSELL COAL COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, ET AL., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:11CV00023 JUDGMENT By: James P. Jones United States District Judge For the reasons stated in the Opinion accompanying this Judgment, it is ADJUDGED AND ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment by Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC, (ECF No. 23) is DENIED; 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants and Counterclaimants (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED; 3. Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and Counterclaimants, the arbitrator’s Award and Supplemental Award are enforced, and DickensonRussell Coal Company, LLC, is hereby directed to forthwith comply therewith;       4. Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC, is directed to pay interest at the annual rate of six percent on the amount of back pay owed to grievant Robert Gilbert in accord with the arbitrator’s Supplemental Award, until paid; and 5. In the event that Defendants and Counterclaimants file a motion seeking attorneys’ fees in accord with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2), Dickenson-Russell Coal Company, LLC, may file a response thereto within 7 days of service. If such a response is timely filed, Defendants and Counterclaimants may reply within 7 days of service. ENTER: January 3, 2012 /s/ James P. Jones United States District Judge ‐2‐   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?