Baker v. McCall et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 31 Motion to Dismiss with respect to the plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983; Plaintiff's remaining state law claim of defamation is DISMISSED without prejudice; finding as moot 34 Motion to Amend/Correct; action is hereby stricken from the active docket of this court. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/6/2012. (flc)

CL SOFFS t.. ST. URT RT
ERK'
CE lS Dt O
AT ROANOKE,
VA

7E % g
9
zs

I TH E UN I
N
TED STATES D I
STRI COU RT
CT
FO R THE W ESTERN DI
STRI O F V I GW I
CT
R
A
BI STON E GA P DI I O N
G
V SI

FE2 26 2 1
22
JUL .
I DUDLEX
BK
GQ
DEPUTY CLERK

R OCK Y L.BA K ER,

Pl i if
antf,

Ci lAc i No.2: 1
vi ton
1 CV00037
FI L O R DER
NA

By: Hon. e E.Co ad
Gln
nr
ChifUnied St t sDiti tJ
e
t
a e src udge

Rox M CCALL,t g,
t l,
D e e ant .
f nd s

l a or nc wih t ac ompan ng me or du opi o i i now
n cc da e t he c
yi
m an m
ni n, t s
O R DER ED
a f l s
s olow :

Themoton t dimisfl by t de e n si GRANTED wih r s c t t
i o s s ied he fnda t s
t e pe t o he

pl ntf camsunde 42U. C.j1
ai ifs li
r
S. 983;
Thepli tf' r ma ni sae lw cli ofdef ma i i DI I
a n ifs e i ng t t a a m
a ton s SM SSED wihout
t

P eudc '
rj ie
,
The pli tf sm oto f l a t tl as c n e d co pl i i
a n if
i n or e ve o ie e ond m nde m ant s
DI I
SM SSED a m oo ;a
s
t nd

Thi a i n s l bea he e i STRI
s cto ha l nd r by s
CKEN fo t a tvedoc toft s
r m he c i
ke hi
court
.

The Clr i diecedt s nd ce tfe c esoft sor ra t a ompan ng
ek s r t o e
riid opi
hi de nd he cc
yi
memor ndum o ni t alcom s lofr cor
a
pi on o l t e
e d.
EN TER : Thi 6t da ofFe r r 201
s h y
b ua y, 2.
A

/
.
-

(

Chi fUnie St t s Di t i tJ e
e
t d a e sr c udg

RK