Securities & Exchang v. Dowdell, et al
Filing
924
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 911 Motion for thirty-fifth interim application for allowance of compensation and expenses; adopting Report and Recommendations re 918 . Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 10/24/2012. (mab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ,
CIVIL ACTION NO . 3:01CV 00116
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TERRY L. DOWDELL, ET AL.,
Defendants.
JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON
On August 17, 2012, the Receiver filed its Thirty-Fifth Interim Application for Allowance of
Compensation and Expenses (“Thirty-Fifth Application”), seeking approval of $5,302.60 in fees and
reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $70.56 for DuretteCrump PLC, and seeking payment of
the 20% holdback amount of $1,060.52. I referred the matter, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1) and
(b)(3), to United States Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler for a report and recommended disposition.
The Magistrate Judge has now issued his Report and Recommendation regarding the Thirty-Fifth
Application.
Upon review of the record, and no objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation within fourteen days of its service upon the parties, I hereby ADOPT the Report
and Recommendation (docket no. 918) in its entirety, and the Thirty-Fifth Application (docket no. 911)
is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as set forth in Judge Crigler’s Report and
Recommendation. Accordingly, the Application is GRANTED to the extent that $1.76 in expenses are
approved, $5,011.60 in fees are approved, and the holdback amount of $769.52 is awarded to the
Receiver.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel
of record and to United States Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler.
24th
Entered this _____ day of October, 2012.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?