Harper v. Astrue
Filing
15
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 14 Report and Recommendations; remanding to the commissioner; dismissing case from the active docket of the court.. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 7/12/2011. (mab)
IN THE U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
F OR THE W ESTERN D ISTRICT OF V IRGINIA
C HARLOTTESVILLE D IVISION
REBECCA HARPER,
CIVIL ACTION NO . 3:10-cv-00056
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE , COMMISSIONER OF
SOCIAL SECURITY ,
Defendant.
ORDER
NORMAN K. MOON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler for proposed
findings of fact and a recommended disposition.
Upon consideration of the parties’ cross
motions for summary judgment, Judge Crigler filed a Report and Recommendation (“Report”)
that the case be remanded to the Commissioner. After a review of the entire record in this case,
and no objection having been filed to the Report’s recommended disposition within fourteen
days of its service upon the parties, I hereby ADOPT the Report (docket no. 14) in its entirety.
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 12) is DENIED; Plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment (docket no. 8) is GRANTED; and this matter is REMANDED to
the Commissioner, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Any other pending motions are DENIED as
MOOT, and this action is DISMISSED from the court’s active docket.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of
record and to United States Magistrate Judge B. Waugh Crigler.
It is so ORDERED.
12th
ENTERED this _____ day of July, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?