King v. Capital One Bank, et al

Filing 103

ORDER denying 94 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying as moot 100 Motion for Stay or Continuance. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 12/5/2012. (mab)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

LORI KING,

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-00068
Plaintiff,
v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. AND
INCHARGE DEBT SOLUTIONS,
Defendants.

ORDER

JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Plaintiff’s Motion
for Reconsideration (docket no. 94) is hereby DENIED. In addition, Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay
or Continuance (docket no. 100) is hereby DENIED as MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Order and the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record.

5th
Entered this _____ day of December, 2012.