Shenton v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER that this matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on May 21, 2018. (ECF No. 21 .) The time to file objections has expired and no party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the mat ter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED: (1) The R&R, (ECF No. 21 ), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; (2) Defendant Aerojet Rocketdyne's Motion to Change Venue, (ECF No. 14 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and, (3) This action is TRANSFERRED to the Charlottesville Division of the Western District of Virginia. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 06/06/2018. (walk, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 6/6/2018.]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

ROBERT SHENTON,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3;17cv404

V.

AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (R&R) entered on May 21, 2018. (ECF No. 21.) The time to file objections has expired
and no party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise

proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1)

The R&R, (ECF No. 21), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court;

(2)

Defendant Aerojet Rocketdyne's Motion to Change Venue, (ECF No. 14),
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and.

(3)

This action is TRANSFERRED to the Charlottesville Division of the

Western District of Virginia.'
It is so ORDERED.

M. Ha
United States

t Judge

Richmond, Virginia

' Because the Charlottesville Division of the Western District of Virginia is the more
appropriate and convenient forum, the Court will leave consideration of Defendant's Motion to
Dismiss, (ECF No. 6), to that court in the first instance.