Carnell Construction Corporation v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing Authority, et al
Filing
218
ORDER finding as moot 179 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; finding as moot 183 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part and denying in part 208 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/2/2011. (mlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
DANVILLE DIVISION
CARNELL CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
DANVILLE REDEVELOPMENT &
HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
v.
BLAINE SQUARE, LLC,
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff
v.
INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Counterclaim Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 4:10CV00007
ORDER
By: Jackson L. Kiser
Senior United States District Judge
Before me is Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Danville Redevelopment & Housing
Authority’s and Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Blaine Square, LLC’s Motion for Judgment as
a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, Motion for a New Trial (ECF No. 208) pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50(b) and 59(a)(1)(A). The parties filed supporting and
opposing briefs to the motion and I heard oral argument on April 12, 2011. The matter is now
ripe for decision. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, I will
DENY Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and GRANT Defendants’ Motion
for a New Trial. All other pending motions are OVERRULED AS MOOT.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Order and the accompanying Memorandum
Opinion to all counsel of record.
Entered this 2nd day of May, 2011.
s/Jackson L. Kiser
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?