Carnell Construction Corporation v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing Authority, et al

Filing 601

ORDER denying 524 Motion for Non-bifurcated Trial filed by Carnell Construction Corporation; denying as moot 527 DRHA's Motion to Quash trial subpoena issued to Geary Davis; denying 531 IFIC's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; d enying 548 Carnell's Motion to Quash subpoenas issued to Lester and America Scales; granting 573 DRHA's Motion to Quash subpoena duces tecum issued to Robert J. Owens; denying 576 Carnell's Motion to Compel production of documents; sustaining 560 DRHA's Objection to Carnell's inclusion of W. Huntington Byrnes on Witness List. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/20/2012. (mlh)

W ERK: OFFI U S DI COURT
X
ST.

A a 6 iy
T- K A

I THE UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STY CT COURT
FOR THE W ESTERN DI
STRI 0F VI
CT
RGW I
A
D AN VI
LLE D I I ON
V SI

P
/
1

JUL C. K . #
D EK

CA RN ELL CON STRU CTI
ON
C ORPOM TI ,
ON

Pl ntf /Countr a m Def nda ,
ai if
e cli
e nt
Ci lAc i N o. 1
vi ton
4: 0CV00007
D AN V I
LLE RED EV ELO PM EN T &
HOU SI AUTHORI
NG
TY,

O R DER

De e nt/Count r l m Pli if
f nda
e cai antf,

By:
Hon.Gl n E. la
e Corr d
ChifUnie Stt sDititJ
e
td a e src udge

BLAI SQUARE,
NE
LLC,
D e e nt
f nda ,

I TERN A TI
N
ONA L FI ELI
D
TY
I SU M N CE COM PAN Y,
N
Cot t c ai D e e nt
m er l m f nda .

I a co da ewih t a co pa ngm e a l opi on,i i now
n c r nc t he c m nyi
mor ndlm ni t s
OR D ERED
a f l s
s olow :

Themo infr u g n a amatro lw sldb ltn ain l d l y
to o j d me t s te f a e y n e ato a Fiei
t
l u a eCompa i DENI
ns r nc
ny s
ED;
Them oto f rnon- f c t d ti lfld b Ca nel Consnzton Com or ton
in o
biur a e ra ie y r l
t ci
ai

Ct r l')i DENI
Cane1' s
ED;

C R

Ca ne lsm oto t quas s
r l'
in o
h ubpoe sis t Le t ra Ame i a Sc l si
na s ued o se nd
rc a e s
DEN IED ;
4.

Ca ne lsm oto t c
r l'
i n o ompe t pr to ofdocl e si DENI
l he oduci n
lm nt s
ED;

5.

Da vi eRe e eo me t n Ho sn Auh rt ' (t U- s' moi nt q a h
n l d v lp n a d u ig to iys ç I ' to o u s
l
Dl A' )
t s poe duc t c is d t Robe t .Owe i GRANTED;
he ub na es e um s ue o
rJ
ns s

6.

DRHA' moton t quas t ti ls po nais dt Ge r Da si DENI
S i o
h he ra ub e s ue o a y vi s
ED
AS M O OT;a
nd

DRHA' o jcint Can l' icu i no W . ni go Byn so iswin s
S be t o r els n lso f Hu tn t n r e n t t e s
o
ls i SU STA I ED .
it s
N

TheClr i die t d t s nd c riid co e oft sor ra t a ompa ng
e k s r c e o e e tfe pi s hi de nd he cc
nyi
m e or nd opi o t a 1c
m a um
ni n o 1 ouns ofr c d.
el e or

ENTER:Th s $'
i *

d yo J n , 201
a f u e 2.

Chi fU nied St t s D it i tJ e
e
t
a e s rc udg