Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al

Filing 41

ORDER dismissing claims as to all Defendants except Officer Roach; finding as moot 35 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 37 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 9 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; finding as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 33 Motion to Dismiss as to all Defendants except Officer Roach. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/30/10. (ham)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff v. TOWN OF CHATHAM, ET AL. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:10CV00035 ORDER By: Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously with this Order, the Plaintiff's claims against the Commonwealth of Virginia, Governor Robert McDonnell, Governor Janice Brewer, Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli II, Attorney General Terry Goddard, the City of Danville, the City of Danville Police Department, the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors, the Town of Chatham, the Town of Chatham Police Department, Chatham Police Chief Marvin Wright, and the Danville City Attorney are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Motions to Dismiss filed by these Defendants (ECF Nos. 9, 11, 15, 20, 35, and 37) are now MOOT, except the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Town of Chatham, the Chatham Police Department, Chatham Police Chief Marvin Wright, and Chatham Police Officer Roach (ECF No. 33), which is now MOOT AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS EXCEPT OFFICER ROACH. Entered this 30th day of September, 2010. s/Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?