Hairston v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER overruling 18 Objection; adopting 17 Report and Recommendations; granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; remanding case to Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 4/26/12. (ham)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION PHILLIP C. HAIRSTON, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of SSA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 4:11-cv-00033 ORDER By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Hon. B. Waugh Crigler recommending that I grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 13] and remand this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2011). The Commissioner filed a timely objection [see ECF No. 18], and Plaintiff filed a timely response [ECF No. 19]. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, I will OVERRULE the Commissioner’s objection and ADOPT Judge Crigler’s R & R. It is hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and that this case shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The clerk is directed to send certified copies of this Order and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion to all counsel of record and to Magistrate Judge Crigler. Entered this 26th day of April, 2012. s/Jackson L. Kiser SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?