Arrington v. Colvin
Filing
19
ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand; denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; remanding case under sentence four to the Commissioner for further proceedings; directing Clerk to remove case from the active docket. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 6/10/14. (ham)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
DANVILLE DIVISION
JOHN R. ARRINGTON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 4:13-cv-00011
ORDER
By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser
Senior United States District Judge
Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“the Report”) of the Hon. Joel C. Hoppe
recommending that I grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment/Motion to Remand [ECF No. 12], deny the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [ECF No.14], and remand this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. This
Report was filed on May 21, 2014, from which date the parties had fourteen (14) days to file
objections. No objections were filed. Accordingly, it is this day ADJUDGED and ORDERED
that the Report shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment/Motion for Remand is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART,
the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and this case is REMANDED
to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report. The Clerk is directed to
REMOVE this case from the active docket of this Court.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to
Magistrate Judge Hoppe.
Entered this 10th day of June, 2014.
s/Jackson L. Kiser
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?