Sydnor v. Colvin

Filing 21

ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand; denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; reversing final decision of Commissioner; remanding to Commissioner for further proceedings; dismissing case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/25/14. (ham)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION NANCY SYDNOR, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 4:13-cv-00041 ORDER By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of Hon. Joel C. Hoppe recommending that I grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand [ECF No. 16] and remand this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The R & R was filed on September 2, 2014, from which date the parties had fourteen (14) days to file objections. No objections were filed. I have reviewed the record and Judge Hoppe’s R & R, and find his recommendation to be well-taken. Accordingly, the R & R shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. It is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 18] is DENIED, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the R & R. The Clerk is directed to DISMISS this case from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is directed to send certified copies of this Order to Judge Hoppe and all counsel of record. Entered this 25th day of September, 2014. s/Jackson L. Kiser SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?