Lloyd v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER granting 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion to Remand; denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 21 Report and Recommendations; reversing the final decision of the Commissioner and remanding the case to the Commissioner. The Clerk is directed to dismiss this case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/28/2015. (mlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION CODY LLOYD, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 4:14-cv-00040 ORDER By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge Before me is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that I enter an Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17], denying the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 19], and remanding this case. This Report was filed on September 4, 2015, from which date the parties had fourteen (14) days to file objections. No objections were filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Hoppe’s Report. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2014) (sentence four). The Clerk is directed to dismiss this case from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Hoppe and all counsel of record. ENTERED this 28th day of September, 2015. s/Jackson L. Kiser SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?