Sellers v. Colvin
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; reversing the final decision of the Commissioner and remanding the case to the Commissioner. (See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)(2014)(sentence four). The Clerk is directed to dismiss this case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/14/2017. (mlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
DANVILLE DIVISION
KAREN DIANNE SELLERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 4:15-cv-00038
ORDER
By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser
Senior United States District Judge
Before me is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
recommending that I enter an Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF
No. 20], denying the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 26], and
remanding this case. This Report was filed on January 24, 2017, from which date the parties had
fourteen (14) days to file objections. No objections were filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED
and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in
its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s
Motion is DENIED, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is
hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge
Hoppe’s Report. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2014) (sentence four). The Clerk is directed to
dismiss this case from the active docket of this Court.
The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Hoppe and all
counsel of record.
ENTERED this 14th day of February, 2017.
s/Jackson L. Kiser
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?