Bottoms v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 13 Motion to Remand; denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; reversing the final decision of the Commissioner; remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Hoppe's Report. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/13/2017. (mlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION DERECK BOTTOMS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SEP 13 2017 Case No.: 4:16-cv-00030 ORDER By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge Before me is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that I enter an Order granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand [ECF No. 13], denying the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17], and remanding this case. This Report was filed on August 23, 2017, from which date the parties had fourteen (14) days to file objections. No objections were filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s Motion is DENIED, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Hoppe’s Report. The Clerk is directed to dismiss this case from the active docket of this Court. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Hoppe and all counsel of record. ENTERED this 13th day of September, 2017. s/Jackson L. Kiser SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?