Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 18 Motion to Remand; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment ; the final decision of the Commissioner is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The clerk is directed to remove this case from the active docket of the court. Signed by Senior Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 2/21/2019. (mlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA DANVILLE DIVISION LOIS B. JONES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FEB 21 2019 Case No. 4:17-cv-00066 ORDER By: Hon. Jackson L. Kiser Senior United States District Judge Before me is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending that I deny the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, reverse the Commissioner’s final decision, and remand this case for further administrative proceedings. The R&R was filed on February 5, 2019, and the parties had fourteen (14) days to file objections. No objections were filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the R&R [ECF No. 22] shall be, and hereby is, ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment/Motion to Remand [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 20] is DENIED, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R. The clerk is directed to remove this case from the active docket of the court. The clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to Magistrate Judge Hoppe. ENTERED this 21st day of February, 2019. s/Jackson L. Kiser SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?