Nasser v. WhitePages, Inc.
Filing
33
ORDER adopting in part rejecting in part 26 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/23/13. (kld)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HARRISONBURG DIVISION
MICHAEL J. NASSER, SR.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
WHITEPAGES, INC.,
Defendant.
Civil Action No.: 5:12cv097
By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
ORDER
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered this day, it is ORDERED that the
defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;
plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. No. 6), Motion for Entry of Default (Dkt. No. 15),
and Motion to Vacate Order on Counsel for Defendant’s Pro Hac Vice Motion (Dkt. No. 17) are
DENIED; and the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26) is ADOPTED in part and
REJECTED in part.
The case will proceed on the following schedule:
(1) WhitePages is directed to file an Answer within fourteen (14) days of the date of
entry of the accompanying Order;
(2) The parties are permitted to engage in preliminary discovery limited to the issue of
the application of Section 230 immunity until July 31, 2013.
(3) The parties are directed to file motions for summary judgment and supporting
memoranda directed to the issue of Section 230 immunity on or before August 16,
2013.
(4) Following review of the motions and memoranda, the court will decide whether oral
argument on the motions is necessary.
The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and
accompanying Order to all counsel of record and plaintiff, proceeding pro se.
Entered: May 23, 2013
/s/ Michael F. Urbanski
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?