Gordon v. James Madison University

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING 62 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 52 Motion to Dismiss; denying 56 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/21/14. (kld)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION PAMELA J. GORDON, Plaintiff, v. JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 5:12cv00124 By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge ORDER The court referred this matter to the Honorable Joel C. Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. Dkt. No. 56. The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on June 30, 2014, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct her Amended Complaint be DENIED and that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint be DENIED as moot. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and recommendation should be adopted in toto. It is accordingly ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend/Correct her Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 56, is DENIED, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Dkt. No. 52, is DENIED as moot, and that the report and recommendation, Dkt. No. 62, is ADOPTED in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record. Entered: July 21, 2014 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?