Chaplin v. Maas et al
Filing
29
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 25 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 3/26/13. (kld)
I TH E UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO URT
N
FO R TH E W ESTER N DISTRICT O F V I GINIA
R
H ARR ISON BURG DIW SIO N
W A LTER CH APLIN ,
Pl nt f,
ai if
V.
DA NI M A AS,etaI,
EL
.
D ef
endant .
s
)
)
)
Ci l ton No 5:2c 28
viAc i
. 1 v300
)
)
) By: M ihae F.Ur ki
c l
bans
)
Unie St t sDit itJudge
t d a e s rc
)
O RD ER
Thi m a t rw a r f r e t t H o a e B. a Crgl r Unied S a e M a sr t
s te s e e r d o he nor bl W ugh i e , t t t s gita e
J , s ntt 28U. C.j636( ()B) f pr posdfndi o fc a arc
udge purua o
S.
b)l( ,or o e i ngs f a t nd e omme e
nd d
diposton.Thema srt j fldarpo t ndr o
s ii
gitae udge ie e r a ec mmen to onFe u r 1 2 3,
dain
bray , 01
r
ecomm endi t def
ng hat endant m oton t di m i be gr ed w ih r pectt t cl m sagai t
s' i o s ss
ant
t es
o he ai
ns
Ofl e D a el a s a d de e wih r s c t t c a m s a ai tDe y J Tyr e a Sh if
tc r ni M a n ni d t e pe t o he l i g ns put oe e nd erf
Ra alFihe;rc mmendi t tdee a s moinf s
nd l s r e o
ng ha fnd nt' to or ummayj dgme bede edas
r u nt ni
m oo a t t c ai sa i td f nda M a a gr n e i pa ta de e i pa t t t
t s o he l m ga ns e e nt as nd a t d n r nd ni d n r as o he
cl m sagai tdef
ai
ns endant Tyr and Fiher and r
s ee
s ;
ecom m endi t tdef ndant M aas a Fi her
ng ha e
s
nd s
bedimis dfom t sa to Defnda sa pli iffldobe to t vai po tonso t
s se r hi cin. e nt nd antf ie j cins o rous ri f he
r tand r
epor
ecom m endaton.
i
Thec ur ha c rf l rviwe t ma srt j e' rpor al jcinst te
o t s aeuly e e d he gitae udg s e q lobe to o h
r t t peri portonsoft r d,and t r evantl aut t a i s doi
epor, he tnent i
he ecor
he el
egal horiy nd, n o ng,
ma adenovodeemi tonoft eporinsoft rpo towhiho jci weema
de
tr nai
hos to
he e r t c be tons r de.
Theco tc l st ttema srt j dge' rpor i s tnilyc rc.Acc r ngl t
ur oncude ha h gitae u s e ts ubsa tal ore t odi y,he
c r ADOPTSt ma srt j ' rc
ou t
he gitae udges e omme toni ise trt
ndai n t niey.
I i t r f e O RDERED a ADJUD G ED a f l s
t s he e or
nd
s olow :
n
n
Dee nt'moto t dimis( . 9 i GR ANTED i partand DENIED i part
fnda s in o s s Dkt# ) s
asf l s:
olow
a Def n nt moto t dim i si G R AN TED ast pl i if scl i sa i t
.
e da s' i n o s s s
o a ntf ' a m ga ns
def ntM aas;
enda
b. D e e a s m o i n t dim is i DENI a t pl i ifs c a m sa ns
f nd nt ' to o s s s
ED s o a ntf l i gai t
de e n sTyr e & Fihe ;
f nda t
e
s r
D ef
endantM aas i her D I I
s eby SM SSED fom t s a i
r hi cton;
3. Dee ns moi frs
fnda t' ton o ummayj me ( . l )i GRANTED i par a
r udg nt Dkt# 1 s
n t nd
DENI i par asf l s:
ED n t olow
a. Dee a s moinf s
fnd nt' to or ummayj dgme ti DENI asmoo wihr pett
r u n s
ED
t t es c o
t cl m sagai tdef
he ai
ns endantM aas;
b. Defnda s'moto f s
e nt
in or ummayj
r udgme o fiur t e us g o i
nt n al e o xha t r unds s
D ENIED w ih r pectt t cl m sagai tdef
t es
o he ai
ns endant Tyr and Fi he
s ee
s r;
c. Dee nt'moinf s
fnda s to or ummayj
r udgme ti GRANTED a t pli ifssae
n s
s o antf' tt
l gr sneglgence cl m r s agai tdef
aw os
i
ai aied
ns endant Tyr and Fiher beca
s ee
s , use
t cl m i ba ed by t a i e s a ut oflm iatons;
he ai s rr
he pplcabl t t e i t i
Def
endantFiheri her DISM I
s s eby
SSED f t s acton.
rom hi i
The Cl r i die t t s n a c r ii d c o t s Or rt c
e k s r c ed o e d e tfe opy f hi de o ouns lofr c r
e
e o d.
Ent ed: M ar 26,2013
er
ch
/ /' 4 J f W c
+ m A
Mi
chaelF.U r
bans
ki
Unied St t D it i J
t
a es s rct udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?