Barton v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, denying 10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Bonnie S. Barton, granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 6/24/14. (kld)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION BONNIE S. BARTON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 5:13cv00050 By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge ORDER This matter was referred to the Honorable James G. Welsh, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. The Magistrate Judge filed a report and recommendation on May 20, 2014 recommending that the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that the Commissioner’s final decision be affirmed. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the opinion that the report and recommendation should be adopted in its entirety. It is accordingly ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED, that the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED, that the report and recommendation (Dkt. No. 18) is ADOPTED in its entirety, that the Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED, and that this matter is STRICKEN from the active docket of the court. The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record. Entered: June 24, 2014 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge The docket refers to Carolyn W. Colvin as the “General Counsel, Social Security Administration.” The court has used her correct position in this Order. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?