Slaydon v. Water Country USA et al
Filing
19
ORDER denying 4 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/18/14. (kld)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HARRISONBURG DIVISION
KEITH S. SLAYDON,
Plaintiff,
v.
WATER COUNTRY USA, et al.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.: 5:14cv00024
By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
ORDER
This matter was removed from the Circuit Court of Rockingham County on May 30, 2014,
by defendant Seaworld Entertainment (“Seaworld”). Dkt. No. 1. That same day Seaworld filed a
Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, arguing that venue was improper under 28 U.S.C. §
1391(b). Dkt. No. 4. On June 4, 2014, the court referred this matter to the Honorable Joel C.
Hoppe, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for proposed findings
of fact and a recommended disposition. Dkt. No. 9. The magistrate judge filed a report and
recommendation on June 30, 2014, recommending that Seaworld’s motion be dismissed. Dkt. No.
13. Specifically, the report and recommendation notes that “‘[t]he venue of removed actions is
governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a),’ which ‘expressly provides that the proper venue of a removed
action is the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place
where such action is pending.’” Id. at 2 (quoting Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc., 345 U.S. 663
(1953)).
No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the court is of the
opinion that the report and recommendation should be adopted in toto. It is accordingly
ORDERED and ADJUDGED Seaworld’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, Dkt. No. 4, is
DENIED and that the report and recommendation, Dkt. No. 13, is ADOPTED in its entirety.
The Clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
Entered: July 18, 2014
/s/ Michael F. Urbanski
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?