Steele v. Marchenko et al
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/17/16. (kld)
p
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
HARRISONBURG DIVISION
SHERMAN R. STEELE,
Plaintiff,
v.
EVGENY I. MARCHENKO, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
) Civil Action No. 5:15cv50
)
)
) By: Michael F. Urbanski
)
United States District Judge
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the court is Plaintiff Sherman Steele's ("Steele") motion for default judgment against
Evgeny I. Marchenko ("Marchenko") and Evgeny I. Marchenko, doing business as M&J Transport
(collectively "Defendants"). ECF No.8. Following a hearing on February 19,2016, the court
('
ordered Steele to produce eVidence indicating whether Marchenko operated the tractor trailer that
struck plaintiff on June 12, 2014. Steele took and submitted the deposition of Trooper Casey White,
ECF No. 23, and this matter is now ripe for judgment. For the reasons that follow, the court will
enter judgment against Defendants in the amount of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($750,000) plus interest.
I.
On June 12, 2014, Steele, a resident of Columbia, Tennessee, suffered injuries in a motor
vehicle accident at a Wilco Hess truck stop in Toms Brook, Virginia. ECF No. 1, ~~ 7, 13. A
tractor trailer backed up and pinned Steele in between the tractor trailer and a Dodge pick-up truck
Steele had just parked. Id.
at~~
a result of the accident. Id.
12-13. Steele suffered serious soft tissue and orthopedic injuries as
at~~
21-24, ECF Nos. 17, 18. Steele filed suit against Defendants on
July 10, 2015. ECF No.1. Defendants have made no appearance or response in this lawsuit,
1
despite receiving personal service on September 12, 2015. ECF Nos. 4, 5. The Clerk entered
default against Defendants on October 29, 2015. ECF No. 10.
II.
A defendant's default does not in itself warrant the court entry of judgment against the
defendant. The court must accept the plaintiff's well pled allegations of fact "as true and deem them
admitted by a defendant." Berthiaume v. Doremus, 998 F.Supp.2d 465, 470-71 (W.D. Va. 2014); see
also Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F. 3d 778, 780 (4th. Cir. 2001). The court must still,
however, determine whether plaintiffs' well pled allegations support the relief sought. Morton v.
Johnson, 2015 WL 4470104, *4 (W.D. Va. 2015)(quoting Ryan, 253 F. 3d at 780- 81). Facts that are
not well pled are not deemed admitted. DirecTV v. Pernites, 200 Fed. Appx. 257, 258 (4th. Cir.
2006). "There must be sufficient basis in the pleadings for the judgment entered." Id.
III.
On February 19, 2016, the court held an evidentiary hearing on damages. ECF No. 14. At
the conclusion of the hearing, the court explained that additional evidence was needed to determine
whether Marchenko operated the tractor trailer that struck and injured Steele. ECF No. 19. In
response to the court's concern, Steele, by counsel, conducted a deposition of Trooper Casey White
of the Virginia State Police ("Trooper White"). Deposition of Trooper Casey White, ECF No. 23-1
("White Dep."). Trooper White's testimony, described below, provides the court with a sufficient
basis to find Marchenko operated the tractor trailer that injured Steele.
On June 12, 2014, Trooper White responded to a motor vehicle crash at the Wilco truck
stop in Toms Brook, Virginia. White Dep. 6:7-16. As Trooper White arrived at the scene of the
wreck, an ambulance left the parking lot. Id. at 6:18-23. Trooper White later discovered this
ambulance was carrying Steele to a hospital in Winchester, Virginia. Id. at 6:20-23. Upon arriving
at the scene, Trooper White recounted the following: "I spoke to the driver of the tractor trailer, Mr.
2
? -.
Marchenko. He stated to me that he was in line at the fuel pt;Unps and had backed up and backed
into the truck pulling the trailer that was being operated by Mr. Steele." Id. at 6:24-7:6. Trooper
White stated that it "was obvious ... that the truck being operated by Mr. Marchenko was the one
that caused the damage." Id. at 9:16-22.
Trooper White reviewed a carbon copy of notes he took at the crash site. Id. at 10:10-16.
These notes include information provided by Marchenko and contained on his license, registration
card, and insurance information. Id. at 10:23-25, 11:11-15. The notes reflect that the tractor trailer
Mr. Marchenko operated belonged to M&J Transport and indicate the USDOT number on the
tractor trailer that struck Steele was 01731265. Id. at 13:8-10, 14:5-11. This number aligns with a
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration document that lists USDOT number 1731265 as a
tractor trailer registered to Evgeny Marchenko, doing business as M&J transport. ECF No. 23-4.
Trooper White's testimony sufficiendy establishes that Evgeny Marchenko operated the
tractor trailer that struck Steele. Further White's testimony and the FMCSA documents indicate that
Marchenko was operating as M&J Transport when he struck Steele. Accordingly, the court finds
that Defendants negligendy caused Steele's injuries.
IV.
Despite seeking damages of $750,000 plus interest in his complaint, Steele now requests
judgment in .the amount of $1,8000,000. Compare ECF No. 1 with ECF No. 23. However, "[a]
default judgment must not differ in kind from, or exceed in amount, what is demanded in the
pleadings." Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(c). Therefore, Steele cannot seek damages beyond the $750,000 plus
interest requested in his complaint.
At the damages hearing on February 19, 2016, Steele produced evidence that he incurred
$145,056.08m medical expenses as of April17, 2015. ECF No. 18. These medical expenses relate
to injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident with Marchenko on June 12, 2014. Id. Steele
3
testified that he has continued and will continue to incur medical costs related to the accident with
Marchenko. Indeed, Steele stated that his injuries prevent him from continuing the workload he
maintained as a truck driver prior to June 12, 2014, and that he struggles to earn income as a result.
Further, Steele testified that he suffers pain daily and that his injuries limit his activities.
Based on this testimony, the court concludes that Steele offered sufficient evidence to
establish that he suffered medical damages and pain and suffering in the amount of $750,000. State
law controls entitlement to interest in diversity cases. McClung v. Smith, 89 F.3d 829 (4th Cir.
1996) (per curiam). Virginia law permits inclusion of interest in personal injury judgments and allows
the court to fix the period during which interest shall accrue. Va. CodeĀ§ 8.01-382. Va. CodeĀ§ 6.2302 stipulates that the "judgment rate of interest shall be an annual rate of six percent." Accordingly
judgment will be entered against Defendants in the amount of $7 50,000 plus interest running at an
annual rate of six percent from June 12, 2014 until payment of the judgment in full.
An appropriate Order will be entered.
Entered:
(JJ '- ;)_._/- ~~"
1~(711-i~d {: ~~
Michael F. Urbanski
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?