Johnson v. Colvin

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting in part 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in its entirety 22 Report and Recommendations. This matter is Reversed and Remanded to the Commissio ner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g), with instructions as stated in the Report. Any other pending motions are denied as moot, and this action is dismissed from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on September 10, 2015. (ca)

Download PDF
IN THE U NITED STATES D ISTRICT C OURT FOR THE W ESTERN D ISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG D IVISION CRISTINA D. JOHNSON, CIVIL A CTION N O. 6:14-cv-00023 Plaintiff, v. ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, A CTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, N ORMAN K. MOON U NITED STATES D ISTRICT JUDGE Defendant. I referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou for proposed findings of fact and a recommended disposition. Upon consideration of the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, Judge Ballou filed a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) that the case be remanded to the Commissioner. After a review of the entire record in this case, and no objection having been filed to the Report’s recommended disposition within fourteen days of its service upon the parties, I hereby ADOPT the Report (docket no. 22) in its entirety. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 16) is DENIED; Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 14) is GRANTED, in part; and this matter is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with instructions as stated in the Report. Any other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT, and this action is DISMISSED from the court’s active docket. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to Judge Ballou. It is so ORDERED. 10th ENTERED this _____ day of September, 2015.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?