Walker v. Colvin
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting re 24 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on August 31, 2015. (sfc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
LYNCHBURG DIVISION
KAREN S. WALKER,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-00025
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN,
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment
(docket nos. 15 and 18), and the Report & Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Robert S. Ballou (docket no. 24, hereinafter “Report”). Pursuant to Standing Order 2011-17 and
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), I referred this matter to Judge Ballou for proposed findings of fact and
a recommended disposition. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, and on
August 11, 2015, Judge Ballou filed a Report recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (docket no. 15) be denied, and the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (docket no. 18) be granted. After a review of the record in this case, and no objections
having been filed to the Report within fourteen days of its service upon the parties, I adopt the
Report in its entirety.
Accordingly:
1.
The Report of August 11, 2015, is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 15) is hereby DENIED;
3.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 18) is hereby
GRANTED; and
4.
This case is hereby DISMISSED.
The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all
counsel of record and to United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Ballou.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered this 31st day of August, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?