Dickerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 27 Plaintiffs Brief - Social Security Case filed by Jennifer Dickerson ; and granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment by Commissioner of Social Security. Clerk is to remove this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on February 15, 2017. (sfc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
LYNCHBURG DIVISION
JENNIFER DICKINSON,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15-cv-00041
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
ORDER
JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment
(docket nos. 27 and 30), and the Report & Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Robert S. Ballou (docket no. 36, hereinafter “Report”). Pursuant to Standing Order 2011-17 and
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), I referred this matter to Judge Ballou for proposed findings of fact and
a recommended disposition. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, and on
January 31, 2017, Judge Ballou filed a Report recommending that Commissioner’s Motion for
Summary Judgment be granted, and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied.
After a review of the record in this case, and no objections having been filed to the Report within
fourteen days of its service upon the parties, I adopt the Report in its entirety.
Accordingly:
1.
The Report of January 31, 2017, is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 27) is hereby DENIED;
and
3.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 30) is hereby
GRANTED.
The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Order to all
counsel of record and to remove this case from the Court’s active docket.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered this 15th day of February, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?