Neville v. Commissioner Of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting in part as set forth in the Report 12 Motion for Summary Judgment, Motion to Remand by Abriel L. Neville; denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment by Commissioner of Social Security; and adopting in its entirety 16 Report and Recommendation. This case is hereby REMANDED for further consideration by the ALJ consistent with the Report, and stricken from the active docket of the Court. Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on September 6, 2017. (ca)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
LYNCHBURG DIVISION
ABRIEL L. NEVILLE,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9/6/2017
CASE NO. 6:16-CV-00006
ORDER
By: Norman K. Moon
United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment
(docket nos. 12 & 14), and the Report & Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Robert S. Ballou (docket no. 16, hereinafter “Report”). Pursuant to Standing Order 2011-17 and
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), I referred this matter to Judge Ballou for proposed findings of fact and
a recommended disposition.
After a review of the record in this case, and no objections having been filed to the
Report within fourteen days of its service upon the parties, I will adopt the Report. Accordingly:
1. The Report of August 22, 2017, is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED in part as set forth in
the Report;
3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED;
This case is hereby REMANDED for further consideration by the ALJ consistent with the
Report, and stricken from the active docket of the Court. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this
Order to counsel.
6th
Entered this ______ day of September, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?