Abed v. USA, et al
Filing
17
Order to file an amended motion re 16 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7 Order Responses due by 3/3/2016. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 2/19/2016. (slt)
CL
ERKS OFFI U, , ST.
CE S DI COUR'
'
AT ROANOKE,
VA
FIED
L
FEB 19 2 1
26
I TH E UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FO R TH E W E STER N D I
STR I O F V I G I I
CT
R N A
R O A N O K E DI I O N
V SI
J A .
ULI DUD EY L
ERK
BY:
'
s
.
D
R
OBAYDA HANI ABED,
FI
Pe ii
tt oner
,
Cas N o.7: c 00356
e
01- v-
By: H on. ihae F.Ur
M c l
bans
ki
USA,
R e ponde .
s
nt
U nied St e Di t i tJudge
t
at s s r c
Oba Ha f Abe fld apr K m o i f r co i rto oft m e a l
yda nii d ie
o
ton or e nsde ai n he mor ndtm
.
opi on a or e dim isng hi moton t va a e, e a i ,orc r cts nt nc pur ua t 28
ni nd d r s s i s i o c t s t sde
ore e e e s nt o
U. C.j2255.Abe ague t tt r we edee t i t colaealpr e ng,butheas
S.
d r s ha hee r fcs n he ltr oc edi
lo
a g st thei a t ly i
r ue ha
s c ua l nnoce tofhi c i i lc r s t s nt ncee ee t saut y
n
s rm na ha ge , he e e
xc ded he t t or
ma mu a t a t ec u ta k dj s ito t e trteci n l u g n .Co s q e t
xi m, nd h t h o r lc e midcin o n e h rmia j d me t n e u nl
y,
t emoinf rrc h i eains e sarme yfipec ie fa i t j2 5 p o e dn a d
h to o e o sd rto e k e d o rev d lws n he 2 5 r c e ig n
as dieal a c t c c a sntnc I ac or ncewlhunie sttsv. cue
lo r y ua ks he onviuĂ´n nd e e e. n' c da
t td ae M l ,
793F. 39 40 ( h Ci.201 ,ii hee ORDERED t tAbe s l,wihi 1 da ,
3d 2, 0 4t r 5) t s rby
ha d hal t n 0 ys
FI a n nde motont tdeeeset rt camsab tt prorj225 pr ce di ort
LE n me d i ha lt ihe he li ou he i
$ o e ng he
c am sa t ki t c c i a s nt nc ' i t n motor wilbedim is d wihout
l i tac ng he onviton nd e e e. fhe nsa t i i l
s se t
p eu iei Ab dfist c mpy.
rj d c f e al o o l
E E Ths /9 dyo F b zr, 0 6
NT R: i
a f enay 2 1.
f f* 4 sJ /.W
+
A
Unied St t s D it i tJ ge
t
a e s r c ud
'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?