Adams v. Watson

Filing 46

ORDER denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration re 45 MOTION for Reconsideration re 6 Order Dismissing Case filed by Dominique Herman Adams. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/17/2015. (slt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION DOMINIQUE HERMAN ADAMS, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 7:10-cv-00383 v. ORDER BRYAN WATSON, Respondent. By: Hon. Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge On October 14, 2010, the court dismissed Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely filed. On March 9, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Petitioner’s appeal, and it has since repeatedly denied Petitioner leave to file a successive petition. Presently before the court is Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration. After reviewing the record, the court finds that none of the arguments in the motion warrant reopening this action. Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The court takes notice of Petitioner’s repeated, meritless filings in this action. Federal courts may issue prefiling injunctions when vexatious conduct hinders the court from fulfilling its constitutional duty. Cromer v. Kraft Foods N. Am., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir. 2004). Before enjoining the filing of motions in this action, the court will afford Petitioner notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, Petitioner is notified of the court’s intention to enter a prefiling injunction against him, and he may submit opposing argument by July 28, 2015. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the parties. It is so ORDERED. Entered: July 17, 2015 /s/ Michael F. Urbanski Michael F. Urbanski United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?