Reese v. Astrue

Filing 24

ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendations and denying plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 02/08/2012. (rkc)

Download PDF
CL S OFFI U.S.Dl O URT ERK' CE sm AT ROM OKE, VA FIED L I TH E UN I N TED STATES DI STR I T C O U RT C FOR TH E W ESTER N D I STRI OF VI G I A CT R NI RO A N O K E DIVISIO N FEB C3 2 1 91 J I C. ULA DUDL CL EM ERK BK . D c CL D AV I LEE R EESE, D C i lA ct on N o.7: vi i 10CV 00538 Pl nt f , ai i f FINA L O R DER M I H AE L J. STR UE , C A C om m i s o ofSo alSe ur t s i ner ci c iy, By: Sam ue G .W is n l lo Unied St es Di t ctJudge t at s ri D ef endant . Thi Soc alSe urt a a by pl i i f D a d Le Re e, asr e r d t t M a s r t s i c iy ppe l a ntf , vi e es w ef r e o he git a e J purua tt 28U. C.j636( ()B)f rviw a f t prpa ai ofarpor s ti udge s n o S. b)1( or e e nd or he e r ton e t etng f t hi pr orh s opos d fndi and r c m e tonsc e i ngs e om nda i once ni ispr r diposton. The r ng t ope s ii M a sr t J gi ta e udge ha f l d a r por w hi h c ude t tt fna de i i n oft Com m i sone s ie e t c oncl s ha he i l c s o he si r ofSo a Se iy i s cil curt s uppore by s t n i e de e a s dbea tr e Thepli ifha td ubsa tal vi nc nd houl fim d. antf s o j ce t t erp r, n t c s i n w b f r tec u t be td o h e o ta d he a e s o eo e h o r. Th c u t a rv e dt Ma itaeJ d esrpo tteo j cin t t t e o ta d e o r h s e iwe he gsrt u g ' e r,h b e to s o ha rp r, n pe tne tpori oft admi sr tve r c d,a c l ri n tons he nitai e or nd oncudest t M a sr t J hat he gita e udge' r por se t i s t taly c r c and t r f e a s ubsan i l or e t he e or dopt t tr por . s ha e t Ac or ngl i i ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt Comm isone ' de ii n i c di y, t s nd ha he s i rs c so s AFFI ED, anifsmoinf rsl r ud me ti DENI a t i c s i RM plitf' to o l mma yj g n s ED, nd hs a e s STR I EN f o t doc toft co t CK r m he ke he ur . EN TER : Febluar 8,2012. ' y UVI STATESDI CT J TED STRI UDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?