Reese v. Astrue
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendations and denying plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 02/08/2012. (rkc)
CL S OFFI U.S.Dl O URT
ERK'
CE
sm
AT ROM OKE,
VA
FIED
L
I TH E UN I
N
TED STATES DI
STR I T C O U RT
C
FOR TH E W ESTER N D I
STRI OF VI G I A
CT
R NI
RO A N O K E DIVISIO N
FEB C3 2 1
91
J I C.
ULA DUDL CL
EM ERK
BK
.
D
c
CL
D AV I LEE R EESE,
D
C i lA ct on N o.7:
vi
i
10CV 00538
Pl nt f ,
ai i f
FINA L O R DER
M I H AE L J. STR UE ,
C
A
C om m i s o ofSo alSe ur t
s i ner
ci
c iy,
By: Sam ue G .W is n
l
lo
Unied St es Di t ctJudge
t
at
s ri
D ef
endant
.
Thi Soc alSe urt a a by pl i i f D a d Le Re e, asr e r d t t M a s r t
s i
c iy ppe l
a ntf , vi e es w ef r e o he git a e
J purua tt 28U. C.j636( ()B)f rviw a f t prpa ai ofarpor s ti
udge s n o
S.
b)1( or e e nd or he e r ton
e t etng
f t hi pr
orh s opos d fndi and r c m e tonsc
e i ngs
e om nda i
once ni ispr r diposton. The
r ng t ope s ii
M a sr t J
gi ta e udge ha f l d a r por w hi h c ude t tt fna de i i n oft Com m i sone
s ie
e t c oncl s ha he i l c s o
he
si r
ofSo a Se iy i s
cil curt s uppore by s t n i e de e a s dbea tr e Thepli ifha
td
ubsa tal vi nc nd houl
fim d.
antf s
o j ce t t erp r, n t c s i n w b f r tec u t
be td o h e o ta d he a e s o eo e h o r.
Th c u t a rv e dt Ma itaeJ d esrpo tteo j cin t t t e o ta d
e o r h s e iwe he gsrt u g ' e r,h b e to s o ha rp r, n
pe tne tpori oft admi sr tve r c d,a c l
ri n
tons he
nitai e or nd oncudest t M a sr t J
hat he gita e udge' r por
se t
i s t taly c r c and t r f e a
s ubsan i l or e t
he e or dopt t tr por .
s ha e t
Ac or ngl i i ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt Comm isone ' de ii n i
c di y, t s
nd
ha he
s i rs c so s
AFFI ED, anifsmoinf rsl r ud me ti DENI a t i c s i
RM
plitf' to o l
mma yj g n s
ED, nd hs a e s
STR I EN f o t doc toft co t
CK
r m he ke
he ur .
EN TER : Febluar 8,2012.
' y
UVI STATESDI CT J
TED
STRI UDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?