Neal v. Circuit Court Danville, VA
Filing
4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, his motion to proceed IFP is denied as moot; and this action is stricken from the active docket of the court. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 09/22/2011. (kab)
et
Eg/: e: I u. ' q ,
F tE : 4tr eeue
ATRQANPG ,
9%
F1
k:Q
SEF 2
I TH E UN I
N
TED STA TES D I
STR I CO UR T
CT
FO R TH E W E STER N D ISTR ICT O F V I G IN IA
R
ROANOKE DI I ON
V SI
B O BBY A .N EAL , ,
JR.
Pett oner,
ii
V.
DANVI
LLE CI
RCUI CO URT,
T
Res
pondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
01
1
J A C.
ULI
,
GLERK
BK
' DEP -$ LERK
;
'
C i lA c i N o.7: c 00
vi ton
11- v- 438
FINA L O RD ER
By:M i hae F.U r
c l
bans
ki
U nied St es D itri Judge
t
at
s ct
I a eo da wih t me or ndum o ni e e e t s da i i he e ORDERED
n c r nce t he m a
pi on nt r d hi y, t s r by
t tNe lspeiin f rwrtofha scor ,purua t 28 U. C.j 2254 i DI I
ha a' tto o i
bea pus s nt o
S.
s SM SSED
wihoutpr j c hi moton t pr e t fnna pa rsi DENI as moot a t s
t
eudie, s i o oc ed q o
upei s
ED
; nd hi
a ton i STRI
ci s
KEN fom t a tvedocke oft c t
r hr c i
t he our.
EN TER : s
Thi
4
#
day ofSe e be ,
pt m r 2011.
#/ed StansimrtJudge
' src .
n '
U ni
t
t Di t i
e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?