Douglas v. Johnson et al

Filing 33

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion for Summary Judgment; defendants Johnson, Clarke, Garman, Ray, Rowlette, Reynolds, and McCoy are TERMINATED as defendants; the remaining defendants shall FILE within forty-five days of this Order a motion for summary judgment; plaintiff SHALL INFORM counsel for defendants within ten days of this Order what specific personal property from his possessions at ROSP is relevant to the remaining Fourth Amendment claims and is necessary to respond to the defendants' forthcoming motion for summary judgment; and plaintiff's motion for an order to transfer property 18 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 3/18/2013. (tvt)

CLERK' OFFI M.. A COUr
: CE : n1
ATx vlte,
k VA
FI
L

I TH E UNI
N
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
FOR TH E W ESTERN DI
STRI OF VI NI
CT
RGI A
RO AN O K E DI I O N
V SI

r

MA !8

f
)

ZULA . D .
I
c
BY:
E
L

) Ci lAci No.7: -vvi ton
11 c 00468
)
)
) ORDER
)
) By: Ho Jacls L.Kie
n. kon
sr
)
Se orUnied St e Dit itJudge
ni
t ats src

LAM O N T 0 .D O U G LA S,
Pl nt f ,
ai i f

G EN E JO H N SO N ,e aI,
t .
Dee
f ndant .
s

l a c da ewih t wrte M e a um Opi on entr t sda i i he e
n c or nc t he itn mor nd
ni
e ed hi y,t s r by
O R D ER ED

t a d fn a t' to f rs mma yj d me ti DENI i pa ta t p an ifsF u t
h t ee d n s moin o u r u g n s
ED n r s o litf o rh
Am e
ndme cai sofbysa rla lt a i tTur r Ta e,Gibe t a W rgh f srp s ar hes
nt l m
t nde i biiy gans
ne , t
l r, nd i t or ti e c
wih f m aesaf pr s ntand GRANTED i par ast a1 ot rc am so q lfe i
t e l t f ee
n
t o l he l i n uaii d mmuniy;
t
de e nt J
f nda s ohns Clr ,Ga ma Ra Rowlte, ynol ,a M c
on, a ke r n, y,
e t Re ds nd coy a eTERM I
r
NATED a
s
de e nt ; her m ai ng def nt s l FI wihi f t tveda oft sOr ram oton f r
f nda s t e ni
enda s ha l LE t n ory-i
ys hi de
i o

s mmayj g n s p o tdb afd vt a d e sn a ya fr tv dee ea dt emeiso
u r ud me t u p re y fi a is d rs ig n fimaie fns n h rt f
pl ntf sr m ani Fourh Am e e cli s pl ntf SH ALL I
ai if e i ng
t
ndm nt am ; ai if
NFORM c ms f def nda s
ot el or e nt
wihi t n da oft sOr rwha s cfcpe s
t n e ys hi de
t pe ii r onalpr ry fo hi pos es i nsa ROSP i r l va
ope t r m s s so t
s e e nt
t t r mai ng Fourh Amendme c am sa i ne es a y t r s
o he e ni
t
nt l i nd s c s r o e pondt de e nt 'f t omi
o f nda s orhc ng

mo inf rsl r j d me t a plitf smo inf ra o d rt ta se p o e t ( n .1 )i
to o l
mma y u g n ; nd an if to o n r e o r n fr r p ry ECF o 8 s
DI I
SM SSED wihoutpr j ce
t
eudi .
TheCl r i diece t s nd c e oft sOr ra t ac ompa ngM e or ndum Opi on
e k s r td o e opis hi de nd he c
nyi
m a
ni
t pl i ifa c m s lofr c df rde e nt .
o antf nd ot e
e or o f nda s

ENTER:Ths l i

dyo Mac , 0 3
a f rh 2 1.
.

Seni U nled St es lt i Judge
t
at
s rct

l

K