Stout v. Hobbs et al
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 10/13/2011. (tvt)
OFFI U. DI M UA
CE B. BX
AT FrJNOKE,
I. .
),
VA
!)
I TH E U N I D STA TE S D I
N
TE
STR I C O U R T
CT
FO R TH E W ESTER N D I
STR I O F VI G I I
CT
R N A
R O A N O K E D I ISIO N
V
DE BO R AH K .STO U T,
Pl ntif
ai f ,
OCT 13 n 1
. ,1
C
JUL ' t ' ') ' 'C'ERK
. ; tJ k J
BY:
D
Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00482
vi t on
11- vM EM O M N D UM O PINIO N
V.
W EN D Y S.H O B BS,W AR D EN ,
FLUV AN N A CO R R EC TI N A L
O
CEN TE R FO R W O M EN ,ET AL.
,
D efendant
s.
By:Sam uelG . is
W l on
U ni ed States Di t ctJudge
t
s ri
Pl i ifDebor h K .St tbrngst sa ton f rc
antf
a
ou i hi c i o ompens t y da a s de a a or
aor m ge , clr t y
rle, n ij n tv r le t r d e salg dvilto so h rFis, g t , n Fo re nh
eif a d n u cie eif o e r s le e oain f e rtEih h a d u te t
Am e
ndme rght . She al gest tt def nda sha dic i i t d aga ns he ; eala e
nt i s
le
ha he e nt ve s rm na e
i t r r t it d
a ns he ; olt d he e
gai t r vi a e r qualpr e ton rg s diplyed dei r t i fer nc t he m e c
ot c i i ht ; s a
lbe a e ndif e e o r dial
ne d 'mpig du o h rfe d mso s e c , x rs in a dc ie a ds b e tdh rt cu l
e s i n e p n e re o f p e h e p e so , n hoc ; n u j ce e o r e
,
a unus puni hm e . Bec e St hasf ie t s a e a c a m f r le , rc pl i i
nd
ual
s nt
aus out
a l d o t t l i or e i f he om a nt s
ds s e wih u p eu ie
imis d t o t rj d c .
Fe a Rul ofCi lPr e e8()2)rquie a' hor andpl nsae ntoft cai
derl e
vi oc dur a( e r s f t
s
ai ttme
he l m
s ngt tt pl de i e ildt r if' Fe R. v. 8a ( .Thi fmiirr ei
howi ha he ea r s ntte o ele . d. Ci P. ()2) s a la ul s
'
gr a l r l xe f
e ty e a d oïpr s pli if,and ltga swih m e iorousc am ss d notbesym id
o e a ntfs
ii nt t rt i
l i houl
t e
byt hnialnzesofpladi Se Be tv.CiyofHa on,775F. 1 1 -78( h
ec c l
e ng. e audet t
mpt
2d 274, 277 4t
Ci.1 ) Therlxai ofRul 8a)2 i no,howe r wiho lmis A c tmus bea e
r 985 .
ea ton
e ( () s t
ve, t ut i t. our t bl
t di ce n f o t c pl ntt pa te bei s d a t a l ged c
o s r r m he om ai he r i s ng ue nd he le
onduc on w hi h e c c a m
t
c a h li
r t . Though r a
es s
el xed,t s a
he t ndar s ilde andsge r lc r e,a i doesnotr uie
d tl m
ne a ohe enc nd t
eq r
cou t toc j r upquesi ne rs rl pr s e t t m.'1 at1
rs t on u e
t
tons ve quaey eentd o he ' d. 278.
St utha ,i t sc e, es nt d t c t t a e g e n- ge c
o
s n hi as pr e e he our wih n i ht e pa ompli ag ns ni
ant ai t ne
de e nt . The gr ofde e nt i l
f nda s
oup
f nda s nc udesa r
ange ofpr e s onaltt e ,f om pr s w a de
of s i
il s r
i on r n
t buidi m a ge t om buds a The c pl i i l s t e def nda s
o l ng na r o
m n.
om a nt nc ude hos
e nt--ofen
t
tng taly- i ade a ld tm e i ofeve soc uni fom J nua y 3,2011t Aug t1
a en i l n
t ie i lne
nt c ng r
a r
o
us 4,
2011. I t cour i a e t di ce n a alege c tt i lvi a i f om t stm elne, ti
f he
t s bl o s r ny l d onsiutona ol tons r hi i i i s
t tSt w asas i d t a c l w ih a di ag ee bl hom os xualr m a e who pr f r ed t us
ha out
s gne o e l t
s r a e
e
oom t
eer o e
a f n t c r a e ai i t ce l a t s f n c ed St t be c d and ha nos bl eds
a o icul t r n he l, nd hi a aus
out o
ol
ve e e .
De piet g ea de a li t c
s t he r t t i n he ompli ,nowhe ea et aleg vi a i ofSt '
ant
r r he l ed ol tons
outs
c tt i lrght ati e t a i vi ua a t o e n t t gr aci i c er.Nor
onsiutona i s trbut d o ny ndi d l c or r ve o he oup tng n onc t
i t c ta et a c i pa tc a c s ofc
s he our bl o s rbe ri ul r our es onduc t pa tc a consiutona vi a i .
t o riulr
tt i l oltons
W hie t pl a ng r esdo noti pos a e c i s a r on St ,s m us of e s e
l he e di ul
m
e n xa tng t nda d
out he
t f r om
f t d on whi h t def nda s c n ba e a ans e oron whi h t co tc n bas a opi on.
oo hol
c he e nt a s n w r
c he ur a
e n ni
Ac o dngy t ec u t ldimisS o tsc mplit t o t rj d c f rfiu et saea
c r i l ,h o r wil s s t u ' o an wih u p eu ie o alr o tt
cl i .
am
x 'e
.
-*
.. *
..
EN TER :Thi 13 h da ofOc obe ,2011.
s t y
t r
z.
.'
e'
xr
E STA TES D I
STRI J DG E
CT U
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?