Stout v. Hobbs et al

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 10/13/2011. (tvt)

Download PDF
OFFI U. DI M UA CE B. BX AT FrJNOKE, I. . ), VA !) I TH E U N I D STA TE S D I N TE STR I C O U R T CT FO R TH E W ESTER N D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A R O A N O K E D I ISIO N V DE BO R AH K .STO U T, Pl ntif ai f , OCT 13 n 1 . ,1 C JUL ' t ' ') ' 'C'ERK . ; tJ k J BY: D Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00482 vi t on 11- vM EM O M N D UM O PINIO N V. W EN D Y S.H O B BS,W AR D EN , FLUV AN N A CO R R EC TI N A L O CEN TE R FO R W O M EN ,ET AL. , D efendant s. By:Sam uelG . is W l on U ni ed States Di t ctJudge t s ri Pl i ifDebor h K .St tbrngst sa ton f rc antf a ou i hi c i o ompens t y da a s de a a or aor m ge , clr t y rle, n ij n tv r le t r d e salg dvilto so h rFis, g t , n Fo re nh eif a d n u cie eif o e r s le e oain f e rtEih h a d u te t Am e ndme rght . She al gest tt def nda sha dic i i t d aga ns he ; eala e nt i s le ha he e nt ve s rm na e i t r r t it d a ns he ; olt d he e gai t r vi a e r qualpr e ton rg s diplyed dei r t i fer nc t he m e c ot c i i ht ; s a lbe a e ndif e e o r dial ne d 'mpig du o h rfe d mso s e c , x rs in a dc ie a ds b e tdh rt cu l e s i n e p n e re o f p e h e p e so , n hoc ; n u j ce e o r e , a unus puni hm e . Bec e St hasf ie t s a e a c a m f r le , rc pl i i nd ual s nt aus out a l d o t t l i or e i f he om a nt s ds s e wih u p eu ie imis d t o t rj d c . Fe a Rul ofCi lPr e e8()2)rquie a' hor andpl nsae ntoft cai derl e vi oc dur a( e r s f t s ai ttme he l m s ngt tt pl de i e ildt r if' Fe R. v. 8a ( .Thi fmiirr ei howi ha he ea r s ntte o ele . d. Ci P. ()2) s a la ul s ' gr a l r l xe f e ty e a d oïpr s pli if,and ltga swih m e iorousc am ss d notbesym id o e a ntfs ii nt t rt i l i houl t e byt hnialnzesofpladi Se Be tv.CiyofHa on,775F. 1 1 -78( h ec c l e ng. e audet t mpt 2d 274, 277 4t Ci.1 ) Therlxai ofRul 8a)2 i no,howe r wiho lmis A c tmus bea e r 985 . ea ton e ( () s t ve, t ut i t. our t bl t di ce n f o t c pl ntt pa te bei s d a t a l ged c o s r r m he om ai he r i s ng ue nd he le onduc on w hi h e c c a m t c a h li r t . Though r a es s el xed,t s a he t ndar s ilde andsge r lc r e,a i doesnotr uie d tl m ne a ohe enc nd t eq r cou t toc j r upquesi ne rs rl pr s e t t m.'1 at1 rs t on u e t tons ve quaey eentd o he ' d. 278. St utha ,i t sc e, es nt d t c t t a e g e n- ge c o s n hi as pr e e he our wih n i ht e pa ompli ag ns ni ant ai t ne de e nt . The gr ofde e nt i l f nda s oup f nda s nc udesa r ange ofpr e s onaltt e ,f om pr s w a de of s i il s r i on r n t buidi m a ge t om buds a The c pl i i l s t e def nda s o l ng na r o m n. om a nt nc ude hos e nt--ofen t tng taly- i ade a ld tm e i ofeve soc uni fom J nua y 3,2011t Aug t1 a en i l n t ie i lne nt c ng r a r o us 4, 2011. I t cour i a e t di ce n a alege c tt i lvi a i f om t stm elne, ti f he t s bl o s r ny l d onsiutona ol tons r hi i i i s t tSt w asas i d t a c l w ih a di ag ee bl hom os xualr m a e who pr f r ed t us ha out s gne o e l t s r a e e oom t eer o e a f n t c r a e ai i t ce l a t s f n c ed St t be c d and ha nos bl eds a o icul t r n he l, nd hi a aus out o ol ve e e . De piet g ea de a li t c s t he r t t i n he ompli ,nowhe ea et aleg vi a i ofSt ' ant r r he l ed ol tons outs c tt i lrght ati e t a i vi ua a t o e n t t gr aci i c er.Nor onsiutona i s trbut d o ny ndi d l c or r ve o he oup tng n onc t i t c ta et a c i pa tc a c s ofc s he our bl o s rbe ri ul r our es onduc t pa tc a consiutona vi a i . t o riulr tt i l oltons W hie t pl a ng r esdo noti pos a e c i s a r on St ,s m us of e s e l he e di ul m e n xa tng t nda d out he t f r om f t d on whi h t def nda s c n ba e a ans e oron whi h t co tc n bas a opi on. oo hol c he e nt a s n w r c he ur a e n ni Ac o dngy t ec u t ldimisS o tsc mplit t o t rj d c f rfiu et saea c r i l ,h o r wil s s t u ' o an wih u p eu ie o alr o tt cl i . am x 'e . -* .. * .. EN TER :Thi 13 h da ofOc obe ,2011. s t y t r z. .' e' xr E STA TES D I STRI J DG E CT U

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?