Canada v. Davis et al
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 51 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 Report and Recommendations; Canada's objections 64 are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/2/2012. (tvt)
CLERK' OFFI U, Di COURT
S
CE S. SI
AT ROANOKE,
VA
FI
LED
I TH E U NI
N
TED STA TES D I
STR I CO UR T
CT
FO R TH E W ESTER N DI
STR I O F V I G I I
CT
R N A
R O AN O K E D I ISIO N
V
K ELVIN A.C AN A D A ,
Pl ntff
ai i ,
V.
W A LTE R DA V I e aI.
S t .
Dee
f ndant .
s
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
N2V 22 2 1
22
J A .
ULI
BY;
C i lA ct on N o.7: v00569
vi
i
11c
O R D ER A D O PTI G R EPO RT
N
A ND R ECO M M EN D A TI N
O
By:Sam ue G . is
l W lon
U nied St es D itri Judge
t
at
s ct
K e vi Ca da,a V i gi a i a e pr e ngpr s ,brngst s a ton pur ua t 42
l n na
r ni nm t oce di
o e i hi c i
s nt o
U. C.j 1 a i tanumbe ofRe Onin Stt Prs ($
S.
983 gans
r
d o ae ion 1
ROSP')e oye , l ng
' mpl es alegi
va i l t tt de e nt us d e e s ve f ce a i thi , aied t pr e thi ,a
rous y ha he f nda s e xc s i or ga ns m f l o ot c m nd
ds ly dd l e aeid fee c t hi me ia n e s Ca a as e sij i erle o d rng
ipa e ei rt n ifrn e o s dc l e d . n d e k nmwtv eif r ei
b
t thebetanse r d t Sus e ISt e Prs t con i physca t r py team e , nd afe
ha
r f r e o s x at ion o tnue
i l he a r t nt a
tr
c
ompl to ofphysca t r py t thebeta f redt Gr n Roc Prs Ca da as s eks
ei n
i l he a ha
r ns e r o ee
k ion. na lo e
ij ncier le o d rngta n o tc r fo ROS Ke nM o nan S aeP io o W alns
n u t eif r ei h t o fi es r m
v
P, e u ti tt rs n, r l
e
Ri e St t Pr s tans thi t c tf hi D e e be 6,201 be h t i l a t the ne r
dg a e i on r por m o our or s c m r
2, nc r a , nd ha
ve
be t a f r e t t e pr s aga n.
r ns e r d o hos i ons i
The c tr ere t m at rt Unie Stt sM agita eJ
our ef r d he te o t d a e
sr t udgePa e aM .Sa g tf ra
m l
r en o
Repor a Re mme tonpurua t 28U. C.j636( ( )B) TheM a sr t J flda
t nd co ndai
s nt o
S.
b)1( .
gitae udge ie
rp r fn i nob ssf rg a tngCa a asrq e t o ij n tv r l fa dr c mme dn ta
e o t idng a i o rn i
n d ' e u s f r nu cie ei n e o n ig h t
e
hsmoin b d n e .( No 5 ) Ca d h so j ce t t eM a itaesRe o t n
i to e e id ECF . 2. na a a be td o h gsrt ' p r a d
Re mme ton.( No.6 ) Ha ngrviwedt Re r a Re omme to Ca da'
co ndai ECF
4. vi e e he po t nd c
ndain, na s
obeci t eo, pe tne pori o t rcoddenov i a c da wih j636( ()
j tons hert and ri nt tons f he e r
o n c or nce t
b)1,
t c tag ee wih t M a sr t J
he our r s t he gi t a e udge sr om m enda i n r ga di Ca
' ec
to e r ng nada' r que tf
s e s or
ij tverle . Ac di y,i i hee ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt M a srt
n unci eif cor ngl t s rby
nd
ha he gitae
FY CLERK
L.
J d e sRe o t n Re o n aini ADOPTED i ise trt , na a so j ctnsae
u g ' p r a d c mme d to s
n t niey Ca d ' be io r
OVERRULED,a Cana ' motonf prlmi r i unci r if( No.51 i
nd
das i or ei nay nj tve ele ECF
)s
DEN IED .
The Cl k oft Cour i die t d t s nd a c r ii d copy oft sor
er
he
t s rce o e
e tfe
hi der
pl i if
a ntf .
ENTER ; N ove be 2, 2.
m r 201
zr
UN I
TED STATES DI
STRI J
CT UDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?