Canada v. Davis et al

Filing 66

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 51 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 Report and Recommendations; Canada's objections 64 are OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 11/2/2012. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK' OFFI U, Di COURT S CE S. SI AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E U NI N TED STA TES D I STR I CO UR T CT FO R TH E W ESTER N DI STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A R O AN O K E D I ISIO N V K ELVIN A.C AN A D A , Pl ntff ai i , V. W A LTE R DA V I e aI. S t . Dee f ndant . s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) N2V 22 2 1 22 J A . ULI BY; C i lA ct on N o.7: v00569 vi i 11c O R D ER A D O PTI G R EPO RT N A ND R ECO M M EN D A TI N O By:Sam ue G . is l W lon U nied St es D itri Judge t at s ct K e vi Ca da,a V i gi a i a e pr e ngpr s ,brngst s a ton pur ua t 42 l n na r ni nm t oce di o e i hi c i s nt o U. C.j 1 a i tanumbe ofRe Onin Stt Prs ($ S. 983 gans r d o ae ion 1 ROSP')e oye , l ng ' mpl es alegi va i l t tt de e nt us d e e s ve f ce a i thi , aied t pr e thi ,a rous y ha he f nda s e xc s i or ga ns m f l o ot c m nd ds ly dd l e aeid fee c t hi me ia n e s Ca a as e sij i erle o d rng ipa e ei rt n ifrn e o s dc l e d . n d e k nmwtv eif r ei b t thebetanse r d t Sus e ISt e Prs t con i physca t r py team e , nd afe ha r f r e o s x at ion o tnue i l he a r t nt a tr c ompl to ofphysca t r py t thebeta f redt Gr n Roc Prs Ca da as s eks ei n i l he a ha r ns e r o ee k ion. na lo e ij ncier le o d rngta n o tc r fo ROS Ke nM o nan S aeP io o W alns n u t eif r ei h t o fi es r m v P, e u ti tt rs n, r l e Ri e St t Pr s tans thi t c tf hi D e e be 6,201 be h t i l a t the ne r dg a e i on r por m o our or s c m r 2, nc r a , nd ha ve be t a f r e t t e pr s aga n. r ns e r d o hos i ons i The c tr ere t m at rt Unie Stt sM agita eJ our ef r d he te o t d a e sr t udgePa e aM .Sa g tf ra m l r en o Repor a Re mme tonpurua t 28U. C.j636( ( )B) TheM a sr t J flda t nd co ndai s nt o S. b)1( . gitae udge ie rp r fn i nob ssf rg a tngCa a asrq e t o ij n tv r l fa dr c mme dn ta e o t idng a i o rn i n d ' e u s f r nu cie ei n e o n ig h t e hsmoin b d n e .( No 5 ) Ca d h so j ce t t eM a itaesRe o t n i to e e id ECF . 2. na a a be td o h gsrt ' p r a d Re mme ton.( No.6 ) Ha ngrviwedt Re r a Re omme to Ca da' co ndai ECF 4. vi e e he po t nd c ndain, na s obeci t eo, pe tne pori o t rcoddenov i a c da wih j636( () j tons hert and ri nt tons f he e r o n c or nce t b)1, t c tag ee wih t M a sr t J he our r s t he gi t a e udge sr om m enda i n r ga di Ca ' ec to e r ng nada' r que tf s e s or ij tverle . Ac di y,i i hee ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt M a srt n unci eif cor ngl t s rby nd ha he gitae FY CLERK L. J d e sRe o t n Re o n aini ADOPTED i ise trt , na a so j ctnsae u g ' p r a d c mme d to s n t niey Ca d ' be io r OVERRULED,a Cana ' motonf prlmi r i unci r if( No.51 i nd das i or ei nay nj tve ele ECF )s DEN IED . The Cl k oft Cour i die t d t s nd a c r ii d copy oft sor er he t s rce o e e tfe hi der pl i if a ntf . ENTER ; N ove be 2, 2. m r 201 zr UN I TED STATES DI STRI J CT UDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?