Canada v. Davis et al
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety 84 and 86 ; Canada's objections are OVERRULED; judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants Davis, Wright, Payne and Turner; denying 85 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and Canada's remaining claims are DIMISSED and STRICKEN from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge Samuel G. Wilson on 1/29/2013. (tvt)
G FRKS OFFI t. . sm r I
CE l Dl A e
S
AT RoM oKE,
VA
FI
LED
I TH E UN I
N
TED STA TES D I
STR I C O U R T
CT
FOR THE W ESTERN DI
STRI O F VI NI
CT
RGI A
R O A N O K E D I SIO N
W
K ELVIN A.C AN A DA ,
Pl ntf ,
ai if
V.
W A LTER D A VI e aI,
S t .
D ef
endant
s.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
J 2S 2 1
AN
23
J AC
ULI
E% LO K
Bï
D (
J
C i lA c i N o.7: v00569
vi ton
11c
ORDER ADOPTI REPORT
NG
AND RECOM M ENDATI
ON
By:Sam ue G.W is
l
lon
U nie St e Di t i tJudge
t d at s s r c
Kevi Ca da, Vigi ai t pr e ngrr s brngst sa i puruan t 42
l n na a r ni nma e oc edi
/ e, i hi cton s t o
U. C. 1 8 a an t n mb ro Re Ono S aeP io (I P' e ly e , l gn
S. j 9 3 g is a u e f d in tt rs n t
ROS ' mpo e s al ig
)
e
va i l t tt def nt us d exc sve f ceag ns hi ,f ie t pr t c hi ,a
rousy ha he enda s e
es i or
ai t m al d o o e t m nd
dipl ed dei r t i fe e et hi me c lne ds Ca da s e dn a t rt tsaut
s ay
lbe a e ndif r nc o s dia e . na e ks m ges mde ha t t e.
Theco tha a pt d t opr vi Re t nd Rec
ur s do e w
e ous por a
omm e tonsi vi Ca
nda i nvol ng nada s
'
j1 camsi t spa tc a ca e i whiht c tds se Ca da' camsag ns
983 li n hi riulr s ,n c he our imis d na s li ai t
s v r l o d f n a t f rf iu et saeacam, e e amoin frap ei n r ij ncie
e e a c - e e d ns o al r o tt li d nid
to o rlmiay n u tv
rle , n g a td s mmayj d me tn fvo o t erman n d fnd nsa t Ca a as
eif a d r ne u r u g n i a r f h e ii g ee a t s o n d '
cli sofde i r e i fe e e. The c tt n a sg d t r mai ngcl m st Unie St t
am
lbe at ndif r nc
our he s ine he e ni ai o t d aes
M a sr t J
gita e udgePn a M .Sar nt who hed ati on De embe 6, 2. On J nua y4,
mel
ge ,
l ral
c
r 201
a r
201 M a srt J
3, gitae udgeSarentfld aRe t Re omme tonpurua t 28U. C.j
g ie
por and c
ndai
s nt o
S.
63 ( )1( rc mme dn e tyo j dg n i fv ro tec re to a o fc rd f n a t
6 b ( )B) e o n ig nr f u me t n a o f h or cin l fie ee d ns
OfierW at rDa s Se g ntW ilam W rg ,Se ge ntPa Pa
fc
le vi, r ea
li
iht r a
ul yne, Ca an De yne
and pt i wa
Tu n r ( No. 4. Ca a aha flda o j cint t a Re o t n Re o n to ,
r e. ECF 8 ) n d s ie n be to o h t p r a d c mme dain
pa ty r ie ai a g nt m a i hi ea le pladi a ofe i not ng s t ntvei
rl et r tng r ume s de n s rir e ngs nd f rng hi ubsa i n
r s o s t t eM a itae sfndn s ( No. 7) Ca d fie t o j c t t eRe r a d
e p n e o h gsrt ' i ig . ECF 8 . na a ald o be t o h po t n
Re o n ain c n enn h smoin frp ei n r ij n to .( No 8 . Ilnte
c mme d to o c r ig i to o r l ay n u cin ECF . 6) ç l h
mi
g
'
a s n eo atmeyfldobe t n, dsrc c u t e dn t o d c ad n v rve b t
b e c f i l ie j ci a itit o r n e o c n u t e o o e iw, u
o
i t a m us onl s ts y is ft tt r i no c ea e r on t f c oft r c d i or t
ns e d
t y a i f t el ha he e s
l r r or he a e he e or n der o
a c tt r omm e ton. Dim ond v.Col alLie & Ac i ntl . , 6 F. 31 31
c ep he ec
nda i ' a
'
oni f
c de ns Co.41 3d 0, 5
(t Ci. 0 5 .Th c u t sstsidt a t eei n ce rer ro tefc o ter c r
4 h r 2 0 ) e o r i aife h t h r s o la ro n h a e f h e o d.
Ha i r ve dt Re rsa dRe o n ai n , n d ' o j ci n t eeo a dp rie t
vng e iwe he po t n c mme d to s Ca a as be to s h rt , n e t n
n
po tonsoft rcor denov i ac or ewih j636( () t co ta e swiht
ri
he e d
o n c danc t
b)1 ,he ur gr e t he
M a sr t J
gitae udge' r omme tonsrga di t e r ofj
s ec
ndai e r ng he nty udgme i fvoroft dee nt
nt n a
he fnda s
( No 8 )a dd n a o p ei n r ij n tv rle ( No 8 )o Ca a asrmanig
ECF . 4 n e il f rlmi ay n u ci e eif ECF . 6 n n d ' e i n
c ai s
lm .
Ac or ngl i i he eby ORDERED a ADJUDGED t tt M agita eJ e'
c di y, t s r
nd
ha he
sr t udg s
Re o t a dRe o n to saeADOPTED i t ere trt ; n d ' o j cin a e
p rs n c mme dain r
n h i n iey Ca a as be to s r
OVERRULED;u g n i ENTERED i fv ro d fn nsDa i, rg tPa n a d
j d me t s
n a o f ee da t vs W ih , y e n
Tu r Ca a asmo inf rp ei n r ij n tv r l f sDENI a dCa d ' rmann
me ; n d ' to o r l a y nu cie ei i
mi
e
ED; n na as e iig
c am sa eDI I
l i r SM SSED a STRI
nd
CKEN fom t c tsa tve doc t
r he our' c i
ke .
TheCl r oft Cour i DI
e k he
t s RECTED t s nd ace tfe co oft sor rt t
o e
riid py hi de o he
pl ntf
ai if
E E Jnayéi ,03
NT R: aur . 2 1.
j
.0,v1
s.-.
.'.e
e*-*
-. . .
u r
*
#
.'
m.
e.e
. '
..
A'
.
..r
..
P
.
.
.3'
.T
''
.'
,.
.
rA
..
,-
.
p
*
.'
#<
'
.'
e
'
.
#
.'
y'
'
V
M
.
I
TED STA TES D I
STR I J D GE
CT U
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?