Chapman v. Willis et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; The Clerk is directed to terminate as parties all defendants except Willis. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/28/2013. (tvt)

Download PDF
' tk .e #eqQ . :*% :œ e ti A >N p iV T y z ,A k . b I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I V SION ï # JUk BK .1 ua , ., o x Cas N o.7: 2- ve 1 c 00389 L O UIS R O Y CH A PM AN , Pl i if a nt f , FI A L O R D ER N V. By: H on.Jac t on L. i e ls K sr Se or U nie St e Di t i tJudge ni t d at s s r c ROM A W I S,% A , LLI D ef endants . I a cor nc w ih t a om pa ng m e or ndum opi on,i i he e n c da e t he cc nyi m a ni t s r by O R DER ED AN D A DJU D G ED ta temoi nfrsl r u g n ( c e No 51 i GRANTED i p r a dDENI i h t h to o l mmayj d me t Do k t . ) s n at n ED n pa t f l : r as olows ( )Th moini GRANTED a t p an ifscamsu d rPREA, 1 e to s s o litf li n e VDOC Op rtng eai Pr c dle a dVign aci n l ttt sa d cams2 3 6 c a 7 c. o e t s n r ii rmia saue n li , , () nd () r ( )Themo ini GRANTED a t cams4, , ()a d( ) 7 a a () 8a d9 o t 2 to s s o li 5 6 a n b , () nd b , n , n he g omdo fiu et e h us a mi itaier me isa rq ie b 4 U. C. 1 9 ea r t f alr o x a t d nsrtv e de s e ur d y 2 S. j 9 7 () a t e ecamsaed s s e wi o t rj ie nd h s li r imis d t u p eudc . h ( )Th mo ini DENI a t p an ifsEihhAme d n cam a an tW il . 3 e to s ED s o litf' g t n me t li g is li s The Clr i die t d t t r i t a pa tesa ldef nt e e W ils TheClr i e k s r c e o e m na e s ri 1 enda s xc pt li . ek s f t rdr c e t s nd aco o t sor rand t ac ompa ngm e o a urhe ie t d o e py f hi de he c nyi m r ndum o ni t t pi on o he pa te . ris ENTER:t hi m. da ofM a 201 y y, 3. r N e o nie St t D i ti tJ m r t d a es s r c udge c

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?